| |
Integrated Pest
Management (IPM)
Prepared by Stephen Augustine and Paul Hosticka (WSBA)
as a preliminary guide to get started in Western WA.
May 21, 2002
The IPM Decision Making Process:
IF pest suppression treatments are
needed...
WHEN are they needed?
WHERE are they needed?
WHAT mix of control tactics could be used?
Elements of IPM:
 |
The IPM philosophy
strongly emphasizes common sense |
 |
IPM in practice: IF
pest suppression treatments are needed, WHEN
are they needed, WHERE are they needed, WHAT
mix of control tactics could be used. |
 |
Prevention is much
better than attempting a cure - help the bees help
themselves. |
 |
Implement regular monitoring/sampling/testing
to be able to make sound decisions |
 |
Use soft treatments
when appropriate |
 |
Use hard chemicals
when only absolutely necessary as indicated by monitoring/sampling/testing
|
 |
Practice rotational
use of chemicals to avoid pests developing resistance
|
IPM uses a combination of strategies to manage pest
populations. It is not always a biological control,
although biological control is a useful tactic. IPM
is not an organic program although it may integrate
organic materials into the control tactic. Nor is IPM
anti-pesticide but generally it attempts to reduce chemical
dependency with a mix of control tactics. Control of
mites in bee colonies needs to move from dependence
on one or a few pesticide chemicals to a balanced IPM
approach.
The success of an IPM program hinges on good monitoring.
Early pest detection often allows for use of non-chemical
controls. By monitoring, the exact location and size
of the pest population can be determined. By analyzing
data collected by monitoring, it should be possible
to predict when a recurring pest might occur and then
more efficiently manage that problem. Sampling/scouting
is a key element in IPM. You should sample on a regular
basis:
(a) to monitor pest population levels, (b) to determine
when a pest is present, (c) the life stage(s) present,
(d) how many are present (the population level).
WSBA IPM Chart
 |
Disease |
 |
Prevention |
 |
Monitoring |
 |
Soft
Treatment |
 |
Last
Resort |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
New breeding stock
such as Russians,
SMR
bees or hygienic bees with a propensity
for grooming |
 |
4.9 mm foundation
as practiced by the Lusby's
(opposed to 5.4 and higher) |
 |
Drone trapping
and freezing |
 |
Avoid exposing
your bees to other infected hives |
|
 |
 |
Visual observation
for deformed bees (wings) |
 |
Screened bottom
board, sugar roll, ether roll, alcohol wash,
drone sampling |
 |
Sticky board and
24 hour mite drop with strips. Less than 25
mites require no treatment. |
 |
Threshold levels
- 5 to 10% total infestation by phoretic (freely
moving) mites. |
|
 |
 |
Formic acid |
 |
Food Grade Mineral
Oil (FGMO) |
 |
Drone trapping
|
 |
Experimental Mite
Zapper? |
 |
Essential oils,
thymol, Apilife-var etc. |
 |
Sugar ester spray,
powdered sugar dusting |
|
 |
 |
Apistan
(fluvalinate) |
 |
CheckMite
(Coumaphos) |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Visual observation
for crawlers and K-Wings |
 |
Sample bees on
top of frames and send to a diagnostics lab
|
 |
Threshold levels
- 10 to 15% |
|
 |
 |
Continual grease
patties |
 |
Menthol |
 |
Formic Acid |
 |
Oxalic Acid? |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Good ventilation
year round |
 |
Good apiary location/conditions
|
 |
Give the bees
good quality feed |
 |
Reduce stress
when possible. |
 |
Replace combs
after five years of use |
|
 |
 |
Look for streaking
on the outside of the hive and inside the
hive |
 |
Poor spring brood
build-up |
 |
Sample bees and
send to a diagnostics lab |
|
 |
 |
Fumidil-B |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Use hygienic bees
such as Marla Spivak's Minnesota Hygienic
Bees |
 |
Avoid using old
equipment or sterilize any old equipment that
you obtain |
 |
Avoid exposing
your bees to infected hives |
|
 |
 |
Monitor by close
inspection of brood every 10 days, look for
perforated or sunken cappings, scales in old
comb. |
 |
Remove and destroy
combs with ANY infected cells. |
|
 |
 |
Terramycin |
 |
(Hygienic bees
can cope with AFB by containing small outbreaks)
|
|
 |
 |
Destroy hives |
 |
Dispose of infected
combs, sterilize other equipment. |
|
 |
 |
Varroa Mite Thresholds
These observations are subjective to individual hives,
climactic conditions, race of bees, etc. and are by
no means meant to be a definitive guide to threshold
levels. Notice that we give very conservative estimates
for what might be reasonable threshold levels when deciding
whether to treat or not.
 |
SOURCE
|
 |
Ether
Roll or Sugar Shake
|
 |
Mite
Drop with Sticky Board
|
 |
 |
| CONSERVATIVE:
Paul Hosticka and Stephen Augustine
|
|
 |
| Ether roll, sugar shake, or
alcohol wash of 100 bees and resulting in
5 mites or less might not require treatment. |
|
 |
| Sticky board and 24 hour mite
drop, with strips (Apistan), of less
than 25 mites requires no treatment. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| Ether roll of 100 bees and
15 mites or less requires no treatment |
|
 |
| A natural mite fall, without
strips, of under 43 - 60 mites per day,
monitored for a 3-day interval using sticky
boards, would not require treatment. |
|
 |
 |
 |
| VERY LIBERAL:
Keith Delaplane, Univ.
of Georgia Honey Bee Program claims
that colonies can tolerate up to 3200-4300
mites before suffering irreparable harm.
Such a population of mites would roughly
correspond to the counts given in the
next two columns.
|
|
 |
| Ether roll (1 ½ inches
of bees per quart jar) yields of under 15-38
mites requires no treatment. |
|
 |
| A natural mite fall, without
strips, of under 59 - 187 mites per day,
monitored for a 3-day interval using sticky
boards, would not require treatment. |
|
 |
 |
 |

|
|